Introduction
For decades, phosphogypsum contamination has served as stark evidence of environmental injustice in Tunisia. During his meeting with the Tunisian Minister of Industry, Mines, and Energy on 4 March 2025, President Kais Saied stressed the need to “find a definitive solution to the phosphogypsum dilemma” in Gabès, asserting that “science is sufficient to prove that this substance is not hazardous”. Less than a day after these directives were received, a closed-door cabinet meeting was held during which it was decided to “remove phosphogypsum from the list of hazardous waste” and classify it as a produced material suitable for use in various fields under “strict conditions”.
The issue concerns the reclassification of industrial waste resulting from the processing of natural phosphate, which contains the following elements in its chemical composition:
- Main components: gypsum (CaSO₄·2H₂O) and phosphoric acid residues.
- Metal contaminants: heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), and arsenic (As).
- Radioactive elements: uranium (U-238) and radium (Ra-226), with variable concentrations depending on the phosphate ore.
Communities affected by its being dumped into the sea by factories suffer this injustice accutely; this dumping has led to numerous environmental, health, and economic problems, perhaps most notably the destruction of fish stocks and rare seagrasses in Gabès. Previously, Gabès had been the home to the largest Posidonia meadows – vital seagrass ecosystems - in the Mediterranean. In addition, commercial and artisanal activities have been harmed, cancer and respiratory diseases have become more prevalent, and infections among the local population have increased. The findings of the July 2024 environmental and social audit report on the Gabès Chemical Complex pointed to numerous violations that confirmed the company’s noncompliance and failure to adhere to the principles of sustainable industrial development, including the excessive cadmium levels in Tunisian phosphogypsum, which were over the regulatory limit of 106.02 NT. This raises serious questions about phosphogypsum, and has led to a local dispute.
On this basis, the announced decision transcends its own technical nature to become a symbolic event with its own implications and meanings, making the decision to reclassify toxic waste an act of political boldness that is uncommon in the context of Tunisian environmental policymaking. The narratives promoted by the regime are no less important than the decisions that were adopted as a political narrative that reveals broader processes related to how the authorities frame problems and, consequently, propose solutions within scientific and political frameworks.
This paper falls under the narrative policy framework, which seeks to deconstruct narrative structures and their associated facts as social constructions of meaning and understand their components and implications at the micro, mid, and macro levels. The importance of narrative policy analysis increases at a time when we, as researchers in the Arab region, find ourselves confronted with authoritarian regimes that deliberately engage in the continuous obfuscation and concealment of information, official data, and the alliances and networks surrounding the policymaking process. In the Tunisian case, the regime tends to promote its policies through Facebook posts, decrees, and speeches laden with rhetoric and emotion. This makes the narrative framework of policies the optimal analytical entry point for deconstructing the narrative of the reclassification of phosphogypsum, including its instrumental objectives, from within the authoritarian text itself.
This paper seeks to answer fundamental questions: How did the Tunisian regime construct its narrative to downplay the dangers of phosphogypsum? What role did these narratives play in shaping environmental policy in Tunisia?
To answer these questions, the paper is divided into six main sections. The first section reviews the series of announced measures surrounding the reclassification decision. In the second section, we examine the decision as a corrective measure responding to local demands. The third section is devoted to deconstructing the narrative structure of the decision. The fourth section analyzes the discursive alliances that support the official narrative. The fifth section examines the discursive and symbolic mechanisms devised by the authorities to suppress alternative narratives. The final section focuses on the neoliberal dimension of the decision to remove phosphogypsum from the list of toxic substances.
The views represented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Arab Reform Initiative, its staff, or its board.